This panel provides a face-to-face forum for our stakeholders to give their input and feedback about our decision making, processes and methodologies.
It also provides us with another avenue to keep our stakeholders better informed about operational and strategic topics of relevance.
We publish information in connection with our customer panel on our website, for information purposes only. While we make every effort to make sure the information regarding our customer panel is informative, this information may reflect works in progress and may be updated or amended from time to time. You should not rely on the information as a substitute for obtaining your own detailed independent advice. The information does not constitute legal, regulatory or business advice, and we do not guarantee its accuracy, suitability, fitness for purpose, reliability or completeness.
Information regarding our customer panel may include the views or recommendations of third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views of Powerlink Queensland or indicate a commitment by us to a particular course of action.
Powerlink is undertaking a review of its asset reinvestment approach and criteria to ensure consistency with sound asset management and risk-based decision frameworks. The review is an opportunity for continuous improvement to deliver further benefits for customers.
We have established the Asset Reinvestment Review Working Group consisting of three members of our Customer Panel, customer advocates, the AER and Powerlink subject matter experts.
The purpose of the group is to consider key aspects of our Asset Reinvestment approach and develop a report with potential recommendations for implementation.
The meeting covered progress on Powerlink’s Draft Revenue Proposal, including a report back from the Revenue Proposal Reference Group on engagement to date. Discussions included expenditure forecasts and cost drivers such as system strength and network complexity. Members also considered delivery risk management using the Gladstone Project as a case study and explored the panel’s evolving role in Powerlink’s accountability processes - featuring reflections on constructive influence and an open discussion to inform future practices aligned with the Energy Charter’s Impact Framework.
